Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsVB SyntaxEnterprise DevelopmentDatabase AccessControlsCOMWin APICrystal ReportDeploymentGeneralGeneral 2
Related Topics
VB.NET / ASP.NETMS SQL ServerMS AccessOther Database ProductsMore Topics ...

VB Forum / Controls / November 2009



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

MSCOMM Control Failed To Create - Suspected Windows Update Issue

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Eli Abitbol - 15 Jun 2009 01:06 GMT
Hi All,
I have an access application that was working fine for many years, and was
using numerous ActiveX components. One of the components is the MSCOMM32.ocx.
Last week our customer rang and advised they are getting an error where the
application starts and the error indicates registration issues.
I have re-registered using regsvr32 utility and it advised registration
completed successfully.
However running the application which tries to create the control object
fails.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Signature

Best regards,
Eli Abitbol
B.Eng. (Hons) Electronic Systems
Senior Design Engineer

Dick Grier - 15 Jun 2009 17:32 GMT
This sounds like a Registry error, that might require some manual editing of
the Registry.

What might have happened is that some other application was installed that
placed another copy of MSComm on the PC and registered it, and now the COM
process is confused.

What I'd do is to, first, search the hard drive for multiple copies of
MSComm32.ocx.  There should be only one, in the Windows\System or
Windows\System32 folder.  If you find multiple copies, run regsvr32 to
unregister the one(s) that you next will delete, the run regsvr32 to
reregister the instance of MSComm that you want to retain.

MSComm32.ocx has no components that it is dependent upon, so this "should"
fix the problem.  Otherwise, you may need to use REGEDIT to examine the
Registry itself to fine the issue.

You say that you suspect a Windows Update issue, but I haven't heard of any
problems with this process.  Still, a fallback that I did at one time (for
something that was Update related) was to use a Restore point to restore to
a known time when everything was working -- I then verified proper operation
and re-executed Windows Update to get back to status quo... Sure enough,
this solved the problem.

Dick

Signature

Richard Grier, MVP
Hard & Software
Author of Visual Basic Programmer's Guide to Serial Communications, Fourth
Edition,
ISBN 1-890422-28-2 (391 pages, includes CD-ROM). July 2004, Revised March
2006.
See www.hardandsoftware.net for details and contact information.

Eli Abitbol - 22 Jun 2009 02:08 GMT
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the prompt feedback.
The reason I suspect Windows Update as after performing system state restore
for 3 days before the day of problem occurs this fixes the issue.
I have found the mscomm32.ocx in Windows\System32 folder and re-run the
regsvr32 against it with no success.
I will try your suggestion of finding all other mscomm32.ocx in the system
un-registering them and the re-registering the one in Windows\System32.
I will keep you posted, and many thanks for your help.
Eli
Signature

Best regards,
Eli Abitbol
B.Eng. (Hons) Electronic Systems
Senior Design Engineer              

> This sounds like a Registry error, that might require some manual editing of
> the Registry.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> Dick
Dick Grier - 26 Jun 2009 17:59 GMT
I've had others report similar issues.... I'm going to investigate this in
more detail when I get the opportunity.

Dick

Signature

Richard Grier, MVP
Hard & Software
Author of Visual Basic Programmer's Guide to Serial Communications, Fourth
Edition,
ISBN 1-890422-28-2 (391 pages, includes CD-ROM). July 2004, Revised March
2006.
See www.hardandsoftware.net for details and contact information.

Larry Stones - 29 Jun 2009 21:53 GMT
Have you come across any clean solutions?  Uninstalling the 969898 patch
allows mscomm32 to work as it did, but leaves one vulnerable.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our Peering Groups change
Visit : http://spacesst.com/peerin
Dick Grier - 30 Jun 2009 18:55 GMT
Hi,

You only are vulnerable, if you host MSComm in IE.  There are no
vulnerablilties for other applications that I know about.  The fact that
these kill-bits affect its use in Access is a bug (IMO).

And, I believe that NETComm solves the kill-bit issue, anyway.

Dick

Signature

Richard Grier, MVP
Hard & Software
Author of Visual Basic Programmer's Guide to Serial Communications, Fourth
Edition,
ISBN 1-890422-28-2 (391 pages, includes CD-ROM). July 2004, Revised March
2006.
See www.hardandsoftware.net for details and contact information.

JPR4PMC - 07 Jul 2009 23:29 GMT
I agree the 969898 patch is the culprit. I too have many programs that use
the MSCOMM control. And everyone of them fail if 969898 is installed. These
are Access based applications using local serial port communication that
present no risk. There is no security issue. A solution to this oversight is
needed yesterday. The machines that have the patch removed will not install
further updates so they are then left vulnerable to 'valid' security risks.
If anyone has a solution that does not involve re-writing dozens of
applications please post it here...

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Dick
Bill Ross - 25 Aug 2009 05:19 GMT
I have the same issue.  Installed MS Update 973346 and it killed the MSComm
controls in MS Access 2007 or 2003.  Any word on a fix?

Signature

Bill Ross
Denver, CO

> I agree the 969898 patch is the culprit. I too have many programs that use
> the MSCOMM control. And everyone of them fail if 969898 is installed. These
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> >
> > Dick
Lisa_BellHawk - 27 Aug 2009 14:13 GMT
Hi Mr. Grier,
I also have a couple of MS Access applications (live production systems)
which have suddenly stopped working because of this kill bit. One uses the
MSComm control to receive input to an Access form from a weighing scale, the
other processes input from a scanning device.
I can't find anything anywhere that says what to do about it. Sure VB.Net
has a new COMM class but what are Access and vB6 users supposed to do???? It
is beyond aggravating that Microsoft has just left us hanging.
My clients have rolled back the update, but I doubt this is a good long term
solution especially since MS seems to keep sneaking the kill bit back in on
other updates as well.

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Dick
David Youngblood - 27 Aug 2009 22:51 GMT
"Lisa_BellHawk" <Lisa_BellHawk@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote...
> Hi Mr. Grier,
> I also have a couple of MS Access applications (live production systems)
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> on
> other updates as well.

Have you read this,
http://msmvps.com/blogs/access/archive/2009/06/14/an-older-version-of-mscomm32-o
cx-has-had-the-quot-kill-bit-quot-flag-set.aspx


It lists 3 options. I have not tried any, but I would think option 2 would
be the logical choice, "- locate the newest version of mscomm32.ocx and
distribute to your users/customers."

David
Janet - 16 Oct 2009 22:23 GMT
I have over 50 users with applications requiring the MSComm32.ocx.  I can
just imagine how much fun I'm going to have when the complaints start rolling
in.  Please - FIX!!!

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Dick
Rico - 05 Aug 2009 19:42 GMT
Hi Mr Grier,
Im using an excel add-in feature to acquire data from an electronic device
that uses RS-232 to serial . Recently as has been mentioned before in this
blog the new microsoft update patch namely KB969898 once installed gives me a
runtime error 424-object required before i even begin gettin data. I went
into the VB code and found where the error was

MSComm.CommPort = Val(Right(fPORT, 1))-(this is where the error is)

  fPORT.AddItem "COM1"
   fPORT.AddItem "COM2"
   fPORT.AddItem "COM3"
   fPORT.AddItem "COM4"

Im not much of a VB person but based on my investigation the value that we
get out of the Val(Right(fPORt,1) code is being assigned to MSComm.CommPort,
and i think the new security patch namely KB969898 is not allowing to set
values on any MSComm components. Is there a new version of mscomm32.ocx that
needs to be installed? or is there any other alternative to using MSComm?
Any kind of help will be much appreciated.

Rico

> I've had others report similar issues.... I'm going to investigate this in
> more detail when I get the opportunity.
>
> Dick
Vadim Galkin - 12 Nov 2009 20:57 GMT
Solution:

Internet Explorer was blocking the MSCOMM control.  It likely does so for
other activex controls that are installed from unsigned (won't pay a fee)
projects.

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\InternetExplorer\ActiveXCompatibility\{648A5600-2C6E-101B-82B6-000000000014}modify
the compatibility flag to a value of 0.

http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1564508&page=1
Vadim Galkin - 12 Nov 2009 21:12 GMT
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/957924

> Solution:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1564508&page=1
DickGrier - 15 Nov 2009 19:52 GMT
The problem with modifying the registry is that this modification may well
be "undone" by future SPs, and would then have to be reapplied.

Signature

Richard Grier, Consultant, Hard & Software 12962 West Louisiana Avenue
Lakewood, CO 80228 303-986-2179 (voice) Homepage: www.hardandsoftware.net 
Author of Visual Basic Programmer's Guide to Serial Communications, 4th
Edition ISBN 1-890422-28-2 (391 pages) published July 2004, Revised July
2006.

DickGrier - 15 Nov 2009 19:46 GMT
Hi,

A recent service pack included "kill bits" for MSComm32.ocx.  The intent was
to keep it from executing (stand-alone) in IE.  The effect was to keep it
from being used in things like Access and Excel (etc.).  It still works fine
in VB applications.

You can use NETComm.ocx, which is a wrapper for MSComm32.ocx (a free
download from by homepage) to avoid this problem.  Its use does require that
code be modified to use the InputData method instead of MSComm's Input
method to read data.  All other code should work without additional change,
unless the CommEvent property is used, which has the same numeric
enumeration, but the enumeration names vary slightly.

Dick

Signature

Richard Grier, Consultant, Hard & Software 12962 West Louisiana Avenue
Lakewood, CO 80228 303-986-2179 (voice) Homepage: www.hardandsoftware.net 
Author of Visual Basic Programmer's Guide to Serial Communications, 4th
Edition ISBN 1-890422-28-2 (391 pages) published July 2004, Revised July
2006.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.