Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion GroupsVB SyntaxEnterprise DevelopmentDatabase AccessControlsCOMWin APICrystal ReportDeploymentGeneralGeneral 2
Related Topics
VB.NET / ASP.NETMS SQL ServerMS AccessOther Database ProductsMore Topics ...

VB Forum / COM / June 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is microsoft.public.vb.com OK?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tony Proctor - 30 May 2007 09:47 GMT
Sorry for the OT post everyone.

The newsgroup microsoft.public.vb.com seems to be behaving strangely here,
and I wanted to check whether it's the newsgroup or my machine, and whether
anyone else has noticed.

My OE variously shows a count of anything from 6 to 26 'unread' messages,
but no such messages appear actually appear (i.e. all appear as 'read'). The
count seems to change each time I click on that newsgroup in my tree. OE
shows the last topic in the newsgroup was "What's the best practice? please"
on about 24-may. I checked with the Web-based view of these groups and that
appears to be correct.

Even in these days of fading favour for VB, a week with no posts seems a bit
long. Plus OE seems to think there are new posts in there but can't make up
its mind how many.

   Tony Proctor
Max Kudrenko - 30 May 2007 10:02 GMT
Tony,
Yet another Microsoft trick. Use Google for accessing it:
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion.
I access it with Google for the last six years and it's getting only
better.
Hope this helps,
Max Kudrenko

On May 30, 8:47 am, "Tony Proctor"
<tony_proctor@aimtechnology_NoMoreSPAM_.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the OT post everyone.
> The newsgroup microsoft.public.vb.com seems to be behaving strangely here,
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> its mind how many.
>     Tony Proctor
Lorin - 30 May 2007 18:42 GMT
Yours failed.
Try
http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion/topics?lnk
=gschg


> Tony,
> Yet another Microsoft trick. Use Google for accessing it:
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> > its mind how many.
> >     Tony Proctor
Al Reid - 30 May 2007 12:39 GMT
> Sorry for the OT post everyone.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>     Tony Proctor

Tony,

I'm accessing the group using OE and have not noticed anything unusual.

Signature

Al Reid

Bob Butler - 30 May 2007 13:27 GMT
>> Sorry for the OT post everyone.
>>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> appears to be correct.
> I'm accessing the group using OE and have not noticed anything unusual.

I don't watch that group but m.p.vb.database has been doing the same thing
for a week or so now.  I've seen this many times on various MS newsgroups
and usually means one of their servers has gone out of whack.  It'll stop
happening eventually.
Bob Butler - 30 May 2007 13:31 GMT
> I don't watch that group but m.p.vb.database has been doing the same thing
> for a week or so now.  I've seen this many times on various MS newsgroups
> and usually means one of their servers has gone out of whack.  It'll stop
> happening eventually.

make that m.p.vb.enterprise
Al Reid - 30 May 2007 13:36 GMT
> >> Sorry for the OT post everyone.
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> and usually means one of their servers has gone out of whack.  It'll stop
> happening eventually.

Usually any time something like that happens, I reset it using Properties>Local File and that solves the problem.

--
Al Reid
Bob Butler - 30 May 2007 13:59 GMT
> Usually any time something like that happens, I reset it using
> Properties>Local File and that solves the problem.

Same here, and it does often work, but not this time. When this happens I
wait several days and try that again until it does work.
Tony Proctor - 30 May 2007 14:00 GMT
Tried all that here but as soon as OE repopulated the view of the group, it
all started to happen again

   Tony Proctor

> > >> Sorry for the OT post everyone.
> > >>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> --
> Al Reid
Jan Hyde (VB MVP) - 30 May 2007 14:47 GMT
"Tony Proctor"
<tony_proctor@aimtechnology_NoMoreSPAM_.com>'s wild thoughts
were released on Wed, 30 May 2007 14:00:57 +0100 bearing the
following fruit:

>Tried all that here but as soon as OE repopulated the view of the group, it
>all started to happen again

No such strangeness here but the I don't use OE ;-)

J

>    Tony Proctor
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>> --
>> Al Reid
Robert Morley - 30 May 2007 18:51 GMT
Another one that sometimes helps in odd situations like these is to click on
"Tools", and then "Get Next <whatever> Headers"...do this repeatedly until
several in a row fail to return any new messages.  Despite what you'd think,
this seems to get messages that a Synchronize Newsgroup/Synchronize All
won't get.

As others have mentioned, this seems to happen in "spasms", for lack of a
better term, and you'll need to do it for several days in a row, then all of
a sudden, it'll be fine for weeks or months, before coming back once again.
I've also noticed that it seems to only happen in higher-traffic newsgroups,
though that could be pure coincidence.

Rob

> Tried all that here but as soon as OE repopulated the view of the group,
> it
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
>> --
>> Al Reid
Joris van Lier - 30 May 2007 14:40 GMT
> Sorry for the OT post everyone.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>    Tony Proctor

This may be the result of retrieving headers for cancelled messages, IIRC after trying to view such a message, the server responds that the message doesn't exist OE removes the header and counts seem to be accurate again.

Signature

Joris van Lier
Please note that all scripts and opinions are supplied "as is" and with no warranty
Blog: http://whizzrd.spaces.live.com

Tony Proctor - 30 May 2007 15:35 GMT
Doesn't sound quite the same Joris. The count here seems to change all time,
going both up and down. At the time of writing, it said there were 21 unread
messages, although I see none

   Tony Proctor

> Sorry for the OT post everyone.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>    Tony Proctor

This may be the result of retrieving headers for cancelled messages, IIRC
after trying to view such a message, the server responds that the message
doesn't exist OE removes the header and counts seem to be accurate again.

Signature

Joris van Lier
Please note that all scripts and opinions are supplied "as is" and with no
warranty
Blog: http://whizzrd.spaces.live.com

Lance Wynn - 30 May 2007 16:47 GMT
I've been having problems with Only this group.  It shows unread messages in
the OE treeview, but shows empty in the actual message list.

This is the first post I've seen in days.

Lance

> Sorry for the OT post everyone.
>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
>    Tony Proctor
Robert Morley - 30 May 2007 18:53 GMT
I've been seeing that as well, though I *have* been getting posts.  I
assumed it was the newsgroups being spammed, but automatically cancelled by
MS's servers, thus artificially increasing the new post count temporarily,
but when a full-fledged update is initiated by entering the group, it
corrects itself.  That's my theory, anyway; I have no specific knowledge
that this is actually the case.

Rob

> I've been having problems with Only this group.  It shows unread messages
> in the OE treeview, but shows empty in the actual message list.
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>>
>>    Tony Proctor
Brian Muth - 30 May 2007 17:00 GMT
Yes, I've noticed the same problem. It's really weird.

Brian
Tony Proctor - 30 May 2007 17:17 GMT
Thanks for the feedback guys. It seems pretty clear now that it's the
newsgroup server and not my machine (or me)?

   Tony Proctor

> Sorry for the OT post everyone.
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>     Tony Proctor
Karl E. Peterson - 30 May 2007 19:42 GMT
> Plus OE seems to think there are new posts in there but can't make up
> its mind how many.

Bingo!  The problem is with OE.  Bob O'Bob can explain this better than anyone, but
the jist of it is...  The NNTP spec is such that news readers request the server
provide an *estimate* of how many new posts there are, not an actual number.  The
client can then use this estimate as it pleases.  Servers are apparently allowed to
over-estimate, but not under-estimate, the number of new posts.  Most programmers
would consider this a good thing, eh?  You're told the max, allocate sufficient
resources, then download and discard the overage.  Thing is, OE doesn't do that last
clean-up.  It believes the estimate, regardless.  Bob tried for years to convince
MSFT to fix this stupid oversight, but they never really seemed to get it.  (As is
the case with NNTP in general, fwiw.)
Signature

.NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org

Tony Proctor - 30 May 2007 19:53 GMT
Wow! Never knew that Karl

Why would it suddenly show up so much recently though? What would cause the
NNTP server to start grossly over-estimating all of a sudden, and to keep
changing the estimation when there are no real unread messages at all? I
can't believe that group is getting spammed more than any others. My count
has been jumping around between about 6 and 26 for several days now.

It's also been happening to a lesser extent in the microsoft
public.vb.enterprise group as well.

If I select 'Catch Up' on these groups, it temporarily goes to zero, but
then comes back again after a few minutes

   Tony Proctor

> > Plus OE seems to think there are new posts in there but can't make up
> > its mind how many.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> MSFT to fix this stupid oversight, but they never really seemed to get it.  (As is
> the case with NNTP in general, fwiw.)
Robert Morley - 30 May 2007 19:59 GMT
Just to add to the list of groups that are doing it, the
microsoft.public.access.adp.sqlserver group was doing it a week or two ago,
but has since stopped.

Rob

> Wow! Never knew that Karl
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> (As is
>> the case with NNTP in general, fwiw.)
Karl E. Peterson - 30 May 2007 20:19 GMT
> Wow! Never knew that Karl
>
> Why would it suddenly show up so much recently though? What would cause the
> NNTP server to start grossly over-estimating all of a sudden, and to keep
> changing the estimation when there are no real unread messages at all?

Bob has studied this in great depth, so hopefully he will comment.  The best I can
offer is that it's related to the clustered nature of their newsservers, and that
when the cluster gets out of sync (not too uncommon in their setup) these various
estimations do as well.  Then, it can become the luck of the draw which actual
server you connect to at any given time.  The privatenews server is *notorious* for
observing this problem.
Signature

.NET: It's About Trust!
http://vfred.mvps.org

Bob O`Bob - 12 Jun 2007 00:46 GMT
>> Wow! Never knew that Karl
>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> server you connect to at any given time.  The privatenews server is *notorious* for
> observing this problem.

I've been otherwise occupied; but that covers it fairly well.

    Bob
--
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.