> Hi,
>
> I would say that using IsNull function is better just because it was
> designed to do this job. Empty string result during concatenation with NULL
> is not documented and cannot be guaranteed and it does not work in a case of
> numeric or date values.
I agree that empty string concatenation is not documented, but it can be
guaranteed to work with Null string values AND since VB is now at EOL the
behavior is not going to change. I think this still works with VB.Net as
well.

Signature
--
Al Reid
Val Mazur - 30 Oct 2004 02:53 GMT
Yes, it works in .NET as well because all NULL strings converted into empty
one during concatenation

Signature
Val Mazur
Microsoft MVP
>> Hi,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> behavior is not going to change. I think this still works with VB.Net as
> well.