I stopped accessing this group for a while. When I came back it was
almost dead. Each day there seem to be fewer and fewer postings and yet
yet the other Classic VB group microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion is
booming. Why would anyone prefer a Microsoft group?
What did I miss?
Tony
--
Auric__ - 28 Jul 2008 21:29 GMT
> I stopped accessing this group for a while. When I came back it was
> almost dead. Each day there seem to be fewer and fewer postings and
> yet yet the other Classic VB group
> microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion is booming. Why would anyone
> prefer a Microsoft group?
Because the most well-known visual BASIC is a Microsoft product?
> What did I miss?
The impending doom of Usenet?
Seriously. I was off the Internet for about 6 months (second half of
2006), and in that time, most of the groups that I subscribe to died.
Even the "hack" groups, previously very busy groups, are bunches slower
than before.

Signature
Evil is a point of view.
BeastFish - 28 Jul 2008 21:40 GMT
Free access to the MS NNTP server while many ISPs are dropping their NNTP
servers?
That's my theory
> I stopped accessing this group for a while. When I came back it was
> almost dead. Each day there seem to be fewer and fewer postings and yet
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Tony
> --
Jan Hyde (VB MVP) - 29 Jul 2008 11:27 GMT
Tony Sewell <tony@caratao.com>'s wild thoughts were released
on Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:04:32 +0100 bearing the following
fruit:
>I stopped accessing this group for a while. When I came back it was
>almost dead. Each day there seem to be fewer and fewer postings and yet
>yet the other Classic VB group microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion is
>booming. Why would anyone prefer a Microsoft group?
>
>What did I miss?
Dunno why, maybe some servers have stopped carrying them.
--
Jan Hyde
https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Jan.Hyde
Tony Sewell - 29 Jul 2008 14:53 GMT
Thanks for the replies
A bit of truth in them all I imagine. Ah well; as the Greeks used to say
and the Geeks obviously still do ... "Change is everything"
Except of course in the case of Classic VB.
Tony
--
Auric__ - 29 Jul 2008 18:34 GMT
> Thanks for the replies
>
> A bit of truth in them all I imagine. Ah well; as the Greeks used
> to say and the Geeks obviously still do ... "Change is everything"
> Except of course in the case of Classic VB.
I wouldn't mind some changes. A non-.Net VB7 with better networking,
easier console access, and 64-bit ints would be nice. (My wishlist gets
bigger every day; that's just a tiny sample.)

Signature
Do it once, do it right, and forget it forever.
Alfie [UK] - 29 Jul 2008 17:34 GMT
>I stopped accessing this group for a while. When I came back it was
>almost dead. Each day there seem to be fewer and fewer postings and yet
>yet the other Classic VB group microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion is
>booming. Why would anyone prefer a Microsoft group?
>
>What did I miss?
Some ISPs have been cutting off their own Usenet servers, but the MS
servers are free/accessible.
You also get a few more ex- and current MVPs who are very active in the
MS groups which may mean a wider skill set to draw on and more rapid
answers...although that's not to put down any of the active regulars in
here :)

Signature
Alfie [UK]
<http://www.delphia.co.uk/>
A fool and his money are soon partying.